Should the Illegal Immigrants in the U.S Be Deported

â€Å"Immigrants create San Francisco† is common sense people around the world acknowledge to praise the contributions immigrants have made. America, as we all know, positioned as the most prosperous and humanistic country in the world, gives immigration a very crucial role due to its function forming the diverse culture of America. Every year, thousands of immigrants move to the United States, seeking superior living conditions such as employment, welfare and education. However, that movement inevitably raises a bunch of social issues, of which the most apparent and controversial one is illegal immigration. Based on this situation, debates about immigration reform were fiercely triggered in public recently. My topic is how to treat illegal†¦show more content†¦From this angle, all social economic elements are able to operate towards an improving trend. The second advantage illegals might provide is investment. As the era has been changing, there is no longer evidence to believe all the undocumented immigrants are rescued from their native countries out of economic reasons. Some persons might own millions in assets but they have to find another ways to immigrate because of the insufficient visa quotas. When they manage to settle down in the United States, they fail to begin their business due to their invalid identities. As a result, this kind of illegal immigrant may tend to invest money into friends’ companies or deal with other black markets avoiding public notice (Zheng, â€Å"Survey Report†). It is depressing that they have the ability to make a contribution to society but they are restricted. So America should give possibility to these potential growth opportunities. The last merit illegals bring to America can be defined as a signal. Undoubtedly America is the most diverse country in the world, and it must accept every possibility no matter how well or bad it might be. If the American government announces to the whole world that they are not going to deport all the illegal immigrants, is it a positive signal to show American pardons. By giving up this signal, America can successfully change the American stereotype, which is strict, towards the external world. Meanwhile, itShow MoreRelatedThe Effects Of Illegal Immigrants On The United States1356 Words   |  6 PagesThere are millions of illegal immigrants in the United States, as Markon (2016) argues that the majority are from South and Central America, Europe, and Mexico. They form a population of between 10 million to 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. One of these illegal is my father, who came to the U.S.A in 1996 to work and tried to pay the numerous debts that he go t in my country; in addition, my country had a large concern where there weren’t jobs and several banks had gone brokeRead MoreDeportation Of The United States Essay1527 Words   |  7 Pagesa nation since the first newcomers arrived over 400 years ago. Immigrants contribute deeply to many of the economic, social, and political processes that are foundational to the United States as a nation. Millions of immigrants are deported every year. The ethnicity of immigrants living in the United States come from all around. Mexico has the largest population of immigrants coming to America. â€Å"The number of unauthorized immigrants living in the United States is estimated to 11.2 million, the majorityRead MoreThe Family Left Behind By Elise Foley1325 Words   |  6 PagesHuffington Post article written by Elise Foley, in 2013 alone the United States deported 72,410 immigrants that claimed to have children that were born here (Foley). This situation that is common in a town where immigrants have settled. St. James Minnesota for example, has a very large immigrant population relative to the town’s size, and many St. James residents have friends and family members that have been deported. This has afforded many of the town’s residents the opportunity to witness the damagesRead MoreIllegal Immigrants Should Be Deported1483 Words   |  6 Pageswill happen to illegal immigrants. But, beside the president should we keep the illegal immigrants and let them live in the US without fear of being deported or should we deport them back to their native countries such as Mexico and other hispanic areas. As research shows immigrants bring danger to the roads, they fill up prisons, and they suck off of American education. All of these will result in americans being affected negatively in some way. Illegal immigrants should be deported. FirstRead MoreMass Deportation Of Illegal Immigrants1582 Words   |  7 PagesMass Deportation of Illegal Mexican Immigrants Cannot Solve America’s Immigration Problems. Immigration and deportation reformation has been one of the hot topics in the 2016 election. Many have chosen which candidate to vote for based on their point of view on immigration and deportation matters. Some supported Donald Trump because he promised to deport all illegal immigrants if he becomes president while others supported Hillary Clinton because she was against mass deportation. In most cases, massRead MorePersuasive Essay On Illegal Immigration906 Words   |  4 Pages Illegal immigrants have traveled to the USA to obtain better opportunities for themselves and their families. The idea of fleeing your home country to find a more suitable area to live in is what almost every immigrant has dreamt of. Most illegal immigrants have moved to America to find new opportunities which they have not had in their home countries. They move here because they know they have better chances of providing for their families. It is imprudent to claim who is an American citizen andRead MoreU ndocumented Immigrants Should Be Legal949 Words   |  4 PagesAmerica is a nation of immigration but America also faces the problem of illegal immigration. In America the debate of whether undocumented immigrants should be able to get full amnesty is still a controversy. Even though illegal immigrants did make an illicit action, many see the United States as an opportunity for a better future. In addition, undocumented immigrants should be granted citizenship because it will benefit the United States. Creating an amnesty for the students will help the UnitedRead MoreIllegal Immigration And The United States1388 Words   |  6 PagesIllegal immigration has plagued the United States since immigration laws were created, and has worsened in recent history. Since Ronald Reagan’s Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 provided amnesty for 3 million illegal aliens in exchange for increased border security, millions of people have entered the country illegally. Over the past 3 0 years, the illegal immigrant population of the country has more than doubled from 5 million in 1986 to over 11.5 million in 2015. It has become one of theRead MoreAn Analysis Of Ask Me No Questions : Marina Budos952 Words   |  4 PagesHow immigrants have been treated throughout the years has changed. However after the attacks on the twin towers on September 11, 2001 the government started deporting more illegal immigrants leaving immigrants in fear. The amount of funding towards immigration increased due to 9/11. With the increased funding towards immigration that caused increased spending in deporting immigrants. In Ask Me No Questions Marina Budhos’ creates several characters who deal with the struggles of immigration afterRead MoreChildren Born in the U.S. to Illegal Immigrants Should NOT Become American Citizens925 Words   |  4 PagesIllegal or Legal Children Children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants should not become U.S. citizens. Many pregnant immigrant women are illegally coming into the country just to have their babies. These women get free medical attention for themselves and the baby. This is costing the U.S. millions of dollars every year. It’s time to end the policy that illegal immigrant mothers can stay in the U.S. just because she has given birth to a child that is now a citizen. These mothers

Oedipus Key Passage Analysis - 1366 Words

Name: Simran Bhatia Key Passage Outline Title of the work: Oedipus Author: Sophocles Chapter: Scene 2 (Creon’s long part) Page number: 1000 Revelation of Theme Character Both State the theme: Creon is very power hungry, yet very intelligent. Why is this a key passage? I believe this was a key passage as it is revealed to the readers just how cunning Creon really is, taking advantage of being powerful without having to live up to the people’s expectations. What techniques does the author use in the passage to illuminate a theme and/ or a character? The author uses characterization to illuminate this character. How does†¦show more content†¦This could symbolize that basically from birth, Oedipus was stuck with his fate/Apollo’s prophecy. Blindness: Albeit he was physically blind, Tiresias could see everything. Oedipus, who was born with eye that gave him sight, was blind to who he was and what he had done. Once he realizes who he really was (his wife’s son, the king’s murderer) and sees the truth, he blinds himself. The Crossroad: Oedipus kills Laius at the crossroads while entering Thebes. Oedipus had run away from home as he was told that he would kill his father and marry his mother (he had thought Polybus and Merope were his parents). Usually when someone is at crossroads, they have to make an important decision and are stuck between choices; Oedipus had the choice to obey Laius or kill him, but fate got the best of him, and Oedipus had killed him. Themes: Fate cannot be changed. Textual support for themes: Laius was told that his son would kill him and marry his wife. When his wife, Jocasta, gave birth to a son, she had bounded his feet and gave him to a shepherd leave in the mountains (so that the baby would die). Laius and Jocasta had tried to defy the gods and the prophecy, but it didn’t work out as the shepherd actually gave the baby (who would grow up to be Oedipus) away to a shepherd in Corinth. Oedipus was told that he would kill his father and marry his mother. To avoid this fate, he ran away and wentShow MoreRelatedSophocles The King And Antigone Essay1566 Words   |  7 Pagescommunity. Although they wielded great power and were dispensers of justice, ultimately, they answered to the gods and were beholden to divine power. The gods oversaw severe punishments for kings that defied them or proved wanting in any way. Both Oedipus the King and Antigone demonstrate how Sophocles’ kings rose to their position on a meritocratic basis, tasked with dispensing justice and protecting their community, and answered to the gods in the end. To understand the nature of kingship in Sophocles’Read MoreAn Analysis of Two Key Passages in Antigone2661 Words   |  11 PagesAn Analysis of Two Key Passages in Antigone During the Nazi occupation of France, Jean Anouilh produced an adaptation of Sophocles’ tragedy, Antigone, as a representation of the struggle between those collaborating with the occupants and those resisting them. While it is possible to read Anouilh’s Antigone as a ‘texte de la Resistance’, it can also be interpreted as an apologia for the Nazis’ severe, authoritarian behavior. The two key passages selected are crucial to the development of the playRead MoreThe Psychoanalytic Theory Of Oedipus Complex3264 Words   |  14 Pages The Psychoanalytic theory of the Oedipus complex by Sigmund Freud Maria-Ourania Dova Student No. 1119868 EN3003-English Special Project Supervisor: Dr Nick Hubble Contents INTRODUCTION 3 CHAPTER 1 4 BIBLIOGRAPHY 11 INTRODUCTION Sigmund Freud’s theory about the Oedipus complex has always been a controversial concept both in psychology and philosophy. The main focus of this chapter is to summarize the development of the Oedipus complex, in Freud’s own writings, over a periodRead MoreFeminism : Women And Femininity3914 Words   |  16 Pagesfemininity in Oedipus Complex; so, after he had become convinced that the Oedipus myth is universal and that the boy?s first desires are for his mother., Based on this, he also could also expect that the girl?s first desires are for her father (Freud, 1913: 257). He also believed that a girl?s negative complex is more emotionally intense than that of a boy, resulting potentially, in a woman of submissive, insecure personality (Bullock: 259).; but On the other hand, Lacanon top of the Oedipus and ManquRead MoreAnalysis of Erik, Phantom of the Opera Using Two Contrasting Personality Theories4920 Words   |  20 Pagesï » ¿Analysis of Erik, Phantom of the Ope ra Using Two Contrasting Personality Theories The tremendously popular and well-known Andrew Lloyd Webber’s 1986 musical production of The Phantom of the Opera was based on the French novel Le Fantà ´me de lOpà ©ra written by Gaston Leroux in1910 (Leroux, 1910/1990). The original novel gave little direct details with respect to Erik’s past; what was abundant however were hints and implications about the character’s life history throughout the book (Leroux, 1910/1990)Read Moretheme of alienation n no where man by kamala markandeya23279 Words   |  94 Pagesï » ¿ANTIGONE KEY LITERARY ELEMENTS SETTING This tragedy is set against the background of the Oedipus legend. It illustrates how the curse on the House of Labdacus (who is the grandson of Cadmus, founder of Thebes, and the father of Laius, whose son is Oedipus) brought about the deaths of Oedipus and his wife-mother, Jocasta, as well as the double fratricide of Eteocles and Polynices. Furthermore, Antigone dies after defying King Creon. The play is set in Thebes, a powerful city-state north of Read MoreComparison Between Aristotle and Plato on Mimesis4881 Words   |  20 Pagesnature of mimesis that powerfully revise Plato’s theories. This paper attempts to interpret in detail the concept of â€Å"mimesis† in Aristotle’s Poetics and how it is manifested in Aristotle’s illustration of tragedy elements, meanwhile by comparison to analysis its similarities and difference with Platonic mimesis. 2 Comparison between Aristotle and Plato on mimesis 2.1 Similarities Although it is often said that Aristotle’s account of mimesis in the Poetics is a critical response to Plato’s exileRead MoreUsing Psychoanalysis to Understand Human Behavior Essay4081 Words   |  17 Pagescharacters, and readers has a place in literary criticism that is as important as the place of psychoanalysis in society. This is because of the mimetic nature of much of modern literature. In fact, the psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan wrote, If psycho-analysis is to be constituted as the science of the unconscious, one must set out from the notion that the unconscious is structured like a language,(1) thus directly relating literature – the art of language - and psychoanalysis. Searching the databaseRead More Matthew Arnold versus Aristotles Poetics Essay examples3833 Words   |  16 Pagessome observations about the way in which some of the seminal ideas in the Poetics affected one key writer within the English literary tradition. Curiously enough the first t hing to be said about Arnolds view of Aristotle is that it is more a Platonic than an Aristotelian view. In short Arnold was primarily, though not merely, an idealist. If, for the sake of clarity we could for the purpose of this analysis call Aristotle a realist, we might be better able to see the proper scope of this account. WhatRead More Psychoanalitic Approach to The Minister’s Black Veil Essay2506 Words   |  11 Pagesactually be. In a psychological analysis, this is a necessary element in both de-personalizing a situation and giving it potential for universal application. In Hawthorne’s The Minister’s Black Veil, many interpretations by way of psychological analysis are possible, and, once exposed, quite apparent. Once revealed, there are many routes for understanding the story in a psychoanalytical context. The main approaches this essay will take involve a Jungian analysis, that is, one involving the use

Hackshaw v. Shaw for Adelaide Chemical - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theHackshaw v. Shawfor Adelaide Chemical and Fertilizer. Answer: Introduction Hackshaw v. Shaw is a case of tort of negligence where the liability of the occupier of a premises towards a trespasser has been discussed. Further the case also discusses about the special obligations that an occupier of a premises owe towards the different types of trespassers. The court in the instant case evaded to recognize the special rules with regard to the liability of an occupier of a premises by putting the law of negligence on top priority. According to the law of tort, negligence means the failure on the part of a person who had duty to take reasonable care to prevent any harm being done to other person from the formers act. The duty that a person owes is a standard duty of care that a reasonable prudent person would have taken in similar circumstances. The basic idea of negligence is that the person who is under a duty to take care should take reasonable care in his actions, keeping in mind the possible consequences that might occur to other person or property and such harm is reasonably foreseeable. This assignment has been prepared to support the arguments given and stand taken by the appellant with regard to the duty of care of a person occupying a premises towards a trespasser the presence of whom is not known to the former. Facts Shaw, the defendant had a farm wherein he had a petrol pump for the purpose of fuelling his automobiles that are used in his farm. The petrol stored in his farm was being stolen. He took various measures to prevent the stealing of petrol but failed in his attempts to do so. He made complaint to the police who asked him for evidences of stealing. The defendant finally decided to confront with the stealer. He came up with a plan and on the night of the alleged incident waited for the thief along with his wife in the farm carrying a rifle and a shotgun with him. Cox, came there in a stolen car with its headlights off along with the plaintiff, Hackshaw, a girl of sixteen year of age. According to the plaintiffs facts, after entering the farm Cox stopped and came out of his car and the plaintiff also came out of the car when the defendant fired a shot which hit her on her arm. Cox then got into the car and ran away after which a number of other shots were fired. On the other hand, accordi ng to the facts of the defendant, when Cox came out of the car he was alone. The latter fired a shot from his gun to warn Cox and at that time probably no one was there in the car. Cox ran towards the car when the defendant fired the second shot which went through the door of the car and might have hit the plaintiff. The later shots made by the shotgun punctured the cars tyre and broke the cars windscreen. The judge at the trial court gave judgment as against the defendant and also held the plaintiff liable for contributory negligence. The defendant made an appeal while the plaintiff made a cross appeal simultaneously to the Full Court. The Court allowed the appeal with majority. Thereafter the plaintiff made a special leave to appeal to the High Court which was thereby granted (Hackshaw v. Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614). Issues There were three main issues in the case. Firstly, whether the defendant owed a duty of care towards the plaintiff even if the latter was a trespasser on his premises. If there was any such duty on the part of the defendant whether the defendant committed breach of that duty when he fired a shot in the direction of the car. Another issue was whether the plaintiff was partly liable for her injury as she was a trespasser on the defendants premises. Arguments The plaintiff claimed that the shot fired by the defendant was deliberate, or careless or negligent. The defendant contended that on the night of the incident Cox came in a car in the defendants premises and as soon as he reached the gate of the premises he turned off the lights of the car. As per the arguments of the plaintiff, she enquired Cox about what exactly was he doing but he ignored to reply. After entering the premises, Cox stopped the car near the petrol pump and went out of the car. She also got out of the car after which she heard a sound of a gunshot after which she got into the car again. She felt pain in her arm. She contended that the second gunshot made by the defendant entered the door and injured her. On the other hand, the respondent in the instant case, contended that the appellant was a trespasser and if the respondent has any obligation towards her it should be there in the principles that apply in case of relationship of the occupier of a premises and a trespasser to the premises. The respondent referred a case whereby it was laid down by the court that the person who occupies a premises has no obligation towards a trespasser to his premises the presence of whom is not known to the former neither he is under a duty to know the same(Commissioner for Railways v. Quinlan (1964) AC 1054). With regard to the claim for compensation for trespass, the view of court in McHale v. Watson was considered by the court. In this case the court held that the burden of proof that the act of the defendant was not intentional lies on the defendant (McHale v. Watson (1964) 388 CLR 111). Judment The jury was of the view that there was negligence on the part of the defendant while firing the shot thereby injuring the plaintiff. The findings of the court raised two issues. Firstly, that whether there was any duty to take care on the defendant that he owed towards the plaintiff who was a trespasser and the defendant did not knew the fact of the latters presence in his premises. Secondly, whether the finding of the trial judge that there was failure on the part of the defendant to take reasonable care can be uphold. In the court in the instant case held that the plaintiff and the defendant do not fall within the relationship of that of an occupier of a premises and of a trespasser to such premises. The defendant was unknown of the fact of the existence of the plaintiff in his premises as the latter was a trespasser. The defendant owed a duty of care only to Cox as the former knew that the latter was present in his premises. On the other hand, according to the jury, the defendant in this case did not owe a duty of care towards the plaintiff as the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen that the plaintiff might be present in his premises. With regard to the issue of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff the jury was doubtful regarding the facts of the plaintiff as she contended that she did not knew that Cox was trying to steal petrol from someone elses property or she was trespassing into the defendants premises. The jury held that irrespective of the refusal made by the plaintiff it can be concluded by the facts presented by her that she was aware that Cox was committing trespass into the defendants premises and therefore she should not have gone in with him. Hence, she was liable for committing contributory negligence. Critical Analysis and Conclusion The essentials that are to be present for constituting the tort of negligence are, first, that there was a duty of care on the part of a person, second, that there was breach of that duty, third, that breach resulted into a legal injury to another person and fourth, that the person owing the duty could have reasonably foreseen the resulting legal injury (Legal services Commission of South Australia, 2012). For the purpose of testing the duty of care neighbours principle was laid down in Donoghue v. Stevenson. The court in this case held that a person who can reasonably foresee that an injury is likely to occur from his act to his neighbour i.e. persons whom the person owing the duty could reasonably foresee is likely to get affected by his act, the person should take reasonable care to avoid such injury to take place in the first instance (Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562). This was a general principle laid down regarding the duty of care in cases of negligence. There are two exce ptions to the duty of care principle, firstly, contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff and secondly, voluntary assumption of risk by the plaintiff. The court is empowered under the Civil Liability Act 2002 to cut off a plaintiffs damages by 100%. The instant case is that of negligence where the defendant took the plea of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. As per the observations made by the court in the instant case it is likely to apply the general principle of the negligence as laid down in Donoghue v. Stevenson instead of any special rule regarding that. The principle of Donoghue v. Stevenson lays down a general obligation on the part of an occupier of a premises. Accordingly, an occupier of a premises owes a duty to take minimum care for any foreseeable injury that may occur to a person who enters that premises. As per the observations made by Murphy J. in the Full Court decision he upheld the decision of the jury regarding the negligence on the part of the defendant on the ground that the defendant did not that the plaintiff was present in the premises. According to him, the cases on which the respondent based his evidence were giving undue advantage to the respondent. The respondent was under a duty to care of a degree higher than that required in cases of negligence ordinarily. Here, the defendant was not protecting himself rather he was firing without even raising an alarm for the trespasser which he considered was of ultra-dangerous nature. The judge referred the observation made my Dixon J. that the due care means the degree of care increases with the increase in the degree of danger (Adelaide Chemical and Fertilizer Co. Ltd. V. Carlyle (1940) 534 CLR 64). Accordingly, higher degree of care is expected in cases involving use of dangerous things like firearms or explosives. In this case also the firing of gunshot made by the defendant attracted a duty of care of higher degree which was not taken by the defendant and therefore he shall be liable for negligence. Also with regard to the issue of contributory negligence, Murphy J. observed that it should be separated from the issue of involvement in commission of an offence. He observed that evidences do not show the presence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff as being accompanying someone in a vehicle does not attracts a risk of getting shot by a firearm even if the person is a trespasser to someones premises who got aggravated due to repeated stealing occurring at his premises. According to an Australian law, which is applicable only in Victoria, a person who occupies a premises is bound by the duty of care to every person and in all conditions that such person does not suffers any injury due to any act performed in his premises (Wrongs Act 1958 s 14B(3)). Further the provision also lays down that while deciding that if the person has taken due care as is required in cases of negligence the ability of the trespasser to foresee the probable injury shall be considered. It is the duty of the person occupying a premises towards the trespasser to prevent any rash or deliberate injury and even if the former knows that the trespasser habitually enters the premises the, he is liable to take due care of his presence. Dean, J., in the instant case held that the occupier owes only an ordinary duty of care towards the persons to which a foreseeable harm may occur and not a special duty. According to the High Court, the judge at the trial failed to recognize that in cases of negligence the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 5E). But the parties failed to take the misdirection as a ground for appeal. Therefore a person occupying a premises may have a duty to take reasonable care towards a trespasser where it may be proved that any harm to the trespasser is reasonably foreseeable by the negligence on the part of the person occupying the premises. Further it can also be concluded that even if there is an illegal trespass in a persons premises, he owes a duty of care towards the trespasser. Reference List: Adelaide Chemical and Fertilizer Co. Ltd. V. Carlyle (1940) CLR 64. Commissioner for Railways v. Quinlan (1964) AC 1054. Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 5E. Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562. Hackshaw v. Shaw 1984 (Cth) CLR 614. Legal Services Commission of South Australia 2012, Negligence, Available from: https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch01s05.php. [14 September 2017]. McHale v. Watson (1964) CLR 111. Wrongs Act 1958 s 14B(3).